Call Medical malpractice Attorney NYC (212) 861-5000

Call For Free Consultation

Prostate Cancer Cases and Tailoring Treatment to the Patient

Steven E. North, Esq. and Laurence M. Deutsch, Esq.

Our practice has been seeing more inquiries about prostate cancer cases and often for good reason.

Some of the most serious cases involve patients who believe their physicians did not make timely diagnoses of prostate cancer. There are many guidelines for prostate screening and testing (including biopsy) put forth by the American Urological Association (AUA). While most practitioners will say that these guidelines are not “authoritative” or a “cookbook,” it is often difficult for a physician to say that he or she provided good care if that care does not conform to the screening guidelines put out by their own organization.

In other instances, tests were administered, but the results warranted follow-up care or treatment that was not provided. Sometimes the issue is communications-related: A physician may not have communicated results to a patient or communicated them improperly to other physicians.

The technique used for a prostate biopsy or more significant surgery has also led to claims.. Some patients were injured by improper use of robotic surgery techniques by physicians who touted its benefits but did not take the time to master them before trying it on patients.

Not all complications are true malpractice, even if a patient is injured. It is well known that prostate biopsies can result in infection. We recently saw a reported case in which, post screening, the patient developed a severe systemic infection that caused injury in multiple places, including his heart. The occurrence of infection secondary to a biopsy, however, is a recognized risk of the procedure and therefore not a sound basis for medical malpractice prosecution. If the need for a biopsy had not been indicated, then the resulting adverse effects might have been actionable.

The medical community has been searching for technologies to replace the physical biopsy to avoid infection risk. It has been suggested that some patients already diagnosed with prostate cancer, the use of MRI instead of biopsy as a monitoring tool might obviate the need for further biopsies with their associated invasiveness and potential for infection or other adverse effects. However, according to a recent study cited on, the accuracy of an MRI as compared to biopsy is still not proven, so the MRI is generally not considered a true substitute for biopsy in all cases. The data do suggest that for a subset of patients with low-grade cancer or those under more active surveillance, an MRI may be an acceptable alternative to a physical biopsy.

The implications of these studies go beyond legal cases and provide some lessons for patient care. A patient making a decision about how to evaluate potential prostate cancer or treat his particular prostate cancer would be well advised to become educated about his particular situation, so he and his physician can tailor the treatment to the risks and/or benefits of his situation., “Can MRI replace Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Surveillance,” May 17. 2017

Back to Medical Malpractice Attorney NYC

Free Consultation!

By NYC Attorney of Your Medical Malpractice Claim

Phone (212) 861-5000

By Email : Click here

Medical Malpractice Verdicts

For Our Clients We Recovered More Than

$200 million

In Verdicts & Settlements

Medical Malpractice Expertise

North & Deutsch has a long history not only of understanding and presenting medical evidence successfully, but also of understanding and presenting the real-world impact of medical malpractice on the life of an affected person and his or her family. Our attorneys have deep expertise and a network of world-class experts to help us determine whether your case does, in fact, demonstrate malpractice.

Medical Malpractice Case Results
  • Obstetrical Medical Malpractice
    $26 Million

    Obstetrical Malpractice

  • Vascular Medical Malpractice
    $15.7 Million

    Vascular Surgery Malpractice

  • Cardiology Medical Malpractice
    $14.8 Million

    Cardiology Malpractice

Medical Malpractice Clients Testimonials

We thank you for your Negotiating tenacity... The award was so much more than either Denise or I anticipated... Read more.

Sally and Denise

Thank you for your responsiveness and professionalism... Read more.

Dr. B

Thank you for everything! I really appreciate your help and kindness... Read more.

Mrs. M.

Meet our Medical Malpractice Attorneys
Medical Malpractice Attorney Steven E. North from NYC
Steven E. North

Specialist in Cases Involving Significant Damages • Listed in Best Lawyers • Listed in Who’s Who • Commentator, Court T.V., Eyewitness News, Talk News T.V. • Contributing Author, New York Law Journal Author of Numerous Publications • Faculty Chairman, Continuing Legal Education Programs • Trial Lawyer and Bar Association Committees

Medical Malpractice Attorney Laurence M. Deutsch from NYC
Laurence M. Deutsch

Specializing in medical malpractice and complex personal injury. Numerous cases to successful verdict throughout NY State. New York Law Journal Verdicts and Settlement Hall of Fame and Ten Best Verdicts in New York State. New York Super Lawyer. Author of numerous publications. Speaker for NY Attorneys on malpractice cases and trial practice. Trial lawyers and Bar Association Committees.

Medical Malpractice Attorney Awards
Medical Malpractice Attorney Awards Medical Malpractice top ten Attorney Awards Medical Malpractice Attorney Awards
Top 20 verdicts Awards Medical Malpractice super lawyer Awards
Medical Malpractice best Attorney Awards


Receive a complimentary consultation from one of our experienced attorneys.